I have been taught in my childhood, “Computer is a device that accepts instructions from a user and generates a corresponding output”. Whenever I use computer, I feel free. The basic freedom i.e. the freedom to use it my way.
But what if I’m cannot use the computer my way? Well, I use Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala and I’m free from the threat. But what if you cannot use the computer the way you want to use it? What if the basic freedom, “freedom to use”, isn’t valid in your case?
The main reason I shifted to Ubuntu was far more urgent than hardware support. Yes, I moved to Ubuntu two years ago because Windows didn’t support my hardware(that’s the reason my friends think of). I’m not sharing here why I shifted to Ubuntu but pointing out why you should shift.
As most people think, their computer should obey their orders, so do I. But when I found out that, with a plan called “trusted computing” and a program called “Windows Genuine Advantage“, Microsoft and others are planning to make my computer obey them instead of me.
Now let us have a review of M$ and its privacy issues. If you are a M$ lover or advocate then you wouldn’t love to hear this as you may be stuck between your love and freedom. The choice is yours, completely yours fellas.
Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) is M$’s system for remotely checking your computer. WGA scans various parts of your hard drive to reassure M$ that you are running an “approved” version of Windows. WGA is mandatory monitoring system and if M$ decides you are not “approved” they can disable your computer’s functionality. Currently Microsoft confirms that WGA checks:
- Computer make and model
- BIOS
- MAC address
- A unique number assigned to your computer – Globally Unique Identifier or GUID
- Hard drive serial number
- Region and language settings of the operating system
- Operating system version
- PC BIOS information (make, version, date)
- PC manufacturer
- User locale setting
- Validation and installation results.
- Windows or Office product key
- Windows ID
WGA have caused a number of privacy related problems, including deletion of software. WGA gets automatically updated as part of M$’s critical update procedures, giving users little choice but to accept changes to the systems M$ can monitor. Many have claimed that WGA is spyware, and although M$ have denied such intent, they retain the power to decide what counts as an invasion of your privacy. Well let us not forget Windows Media Player in Windows 7 Beta phase corrupting mp3′s.
For Windows 7 they are changing the name of the product to Windows 7 Activation Technologies (WAT), but the functionality remains the same.
Microsoft’s version of a “Trusted Computing” scheme is called “Palladium“. Proprietary programs have included malicious features before, but Palladium would make it universal.
Hollywood and the record companies will use Palladium to ensure that downloaded videos and music can be played only on one specified computer and the sharing of ‘authorized’ files will be entirely impossible.
Making sharing impossible is bad enough, but it gets worse. There are plans to use the same facility for email and documents–resulting in email that disappears in two weeks, or documents that can only be read on the computers in one company.
Consider a scenario, your teacher told you via email, to do something nasty and risky. After weeks of the task being completed, your teacher steps aside and you have no proof that it was your teacher’s decision.
Moreover, Treacherous computing puts the existence of free operating systems and free applications at risk, because you may not be able to run them at all.
Some versions of treacherous computing would require the operating system to be specifically authorized by a particular company. Free operating systems could not be installed. Some versions of treacherous computing would require every program to be specifically authorized by the operating system developer.
You could not run free applications on such a system. If you did figure out how, and told someone, that could be a crime.
Now let us not speak of foreign affairs and step back to out country, our society and M$ Nepal.
Let us have a look back at how M$ Nepal is violating its own privacy statements.

Forum Post - Mr. ubuntubay

Forum Post - Mr. Allen
You can go to the forum here to view the full discussion. In the above image you can see that although the user ubuntubay was hidden behind a handle, his information (name) was disclosed publicly. I think the Mr. Admin hadn’t seen the movie Spider Man.
“With great power, comes great responsibility” – Uncle Ben, SpiderMan
This shows that M$ shows no respect to its user’s privacy.
If you still think that you are a human, you have rights and you respect you privacy and want to ship to free OSes like Ubuntu, Fedora, etc then visit our FORUM. Feel free to ask questions there. We are heartily willing to help people to shift to Linux.
Feel free to comment.
Regards
fr3ak
Reference: http://en.windows7sins.org/
Tags: computer, computer privacy, hollywood, hollywood palladium, karmic, karmic koala, M$ monopoly, microsoft, microsoft plans, monopoly, move to ubuntu, palladium, privacy, shift to ubuntu, treacherous, treacherous computing, trusted computing, Ubuntu, why move to ubuntu, windows, windows 7, windows genuine advantage, WMG
Interesting article. I was not aware of the exact details of information being collected by WGA.
You said MS software restricted you from using the PC your way. Could you please elaborate on that. I would really like to know the kind of restrictions imposed upon me by MS software that would hinder the intended functionality of the PC for a user like me. I’m a professional in the telecom sector and I use my PC everyday for Internet/email, word processing, spreadsheet and few other database and telecom-related applications.
Thank you.
I would also like to add to the above post that I have worked as a professional C programmer for 3 years in the past developing firmware (GNU C) on real time Linux OS for telecom controller equipment. Without any biaseness towards any product, I think its relevant to mention here that I would rather pay some amount to buy an alternate OS than spend time and resources to write drivers myself for every hardware I buy.
Well through WGA, Microsoft is currently only monitoring the contents of your disks, you BIOS and other hardwares information. But we should not forget the incident that Beta Release of Windows 7 deleted 1000s of mp3 from computers because they were suspected to be pirated.
And about writing drivers for the system. Being a UNIX admin, if you cannot select what hardware are appropriate for your system then in that case I have no words for you.
Even today, we (me and some of my friends), even buying small hardwares like CDMA devices, webcams etc.. we check if they are *INX compliant or not. I am currently planning to buy a laptop and well going through many of then to check if all the hardwares vendor are Linux supporting type or not?
You being a system admin of a responsible corporation of Nepal and showing such irresponsible activity is a shame to tech associates like us. Now I can see why the status of telecom hasn’t been better in years with technological advancements.
Greetz
fr3ak
Hi. I was expecting a slightly non-typical response from you. But it looks like my words didn’t express my tone.
My intention was to really understand the shortcomings in the Windows product so that I can make a wise decision while buying an OS next time. Otherwise I wouldn’t even bother commenting here.
Usually when I ask people who usually promote Linux or any other open source product, I have several times received an answer in the line of – “Oh, why worry about drivers, you can write your own here, since you have the source code.”
This certainly is an advantage. But my second post where I said I’d pay rather than write my own driver, I simply intended to let you know that while this is a very big advantage, it doesn’t work for me.
So, if I have been able to convince you that my post was in no way a challenge, but just a request for elaborations, please respond. And this request is not just to the original poster, but to anybody else who would be interested to share their first hand experience here.
Dear insnp,
M$ Window$ (or any proprietary software) restricts the use of the software in various ways. Say for example, if you wish to perform the installation of normal version of Windows you purchased in a PC without an internet connection, you will not be allowed to use it properly and it will nag you (threat you??) with various messages and may stop you from using it (even when you bought it). I guess you knew that already, but that is just an example.
That does not happen with Free Software. You buy it (or get it for Free or whatever), you get to use it any way you want. Also, you will be able to modify it, or share with your friends, use in multiple PCs (if you don’t bother about the support) and do things that were never possible with proprietary softwares. Also, you get the source code, which prety much ensures the vendors not using your information without you noticing.
And about the answers regarding writing drivers and such, I don’t know who actually told you that, but I’m sure s/he was not a driver developer or at least not someone who has written drivers for hardwares that are built by someone else and even the developer documentations are not available. It is not easy to write drivers, even difficult when no detailed documentation is made available by the vendors. Also, if you can create drivers for Linux, you can also create ones for Windows. When somebody tells you that next time, just tell them “You can write your own drivers for Windows too. You don’t need kernel source code for that. OS Development API and knowledge of hardware is enough information.” Maybe they will then come up with a better explanation.
Even I’d pay rather than having to write a driver for an unknown hardware. It might just take years to reverse engineer the hardware and actually make it work.
But money is not much of a issue. The bigger and more important thing is that we have freedom if we are using Free(swatantra) Software. We need not be bound by long and unimportant (whats the use?) piece of document (EULA) which is probably different for each proprietary software (in Free Software world, we have a small set of licenses which are common for most of the softwares). We can use the program in whaever way possible, learn from it to create better ones, share the program, edit it if it does not fit our needs (or pay someone to do so if we can’t do that ourselves) rather than wait for enough market for the addition or change to be considered by the vendor.
And if you have made up your mind to use Free Software (like Linux) for yourself, it is not difficult to find the hardware that works in Linux. In fact, I have encountered very few hardwares that do not work with Linux.. It has not always been the same though. My PC-TEL HSP56 Softmodem made me use Windows for over a year as a kid. I was at school and I would not get Rs. 2000 for buying an external modem which worked with Linux, and had to surf via that internal Win modem that cost a mere Rs. 500. However, things have changed a lot now. Most hardwares I have encountered work flawlessly under linux these days. In fact, I have a Webcam lying on my table which belongs to my friend coz he uses Windows 7 and he does not have driver for it. It has worked in my PC in Jaunty(ubuntu 9.04), Karmic(ubuntu 9.10) and now Alpha version of Lucid(ubuntu 10.04) without problems.
But since you might run into problems with some hardware, you must check if the hardware runs well on Linux before you decide to purchase (like you’d do if you used Win Vista or Win 7). And, as of now, I believe it is a lot easier to find hardware that works with Linux than finding one that runs on particular version of Windows.
I’m sorry for the long post, but I hope I cleared some of your doubts.
You certainly did.
I see your point. I will remember these things, as well as try to get some more, when I have to make a decision on choosing a product. Thanks a lot.